| U.S. Federal Trade Commission |
FTC News Release, Apr 27, 2009
FTC Charges Marketers of ‘Hoodia’ Weight Loss Supplements With Deceptive Advertising
The Federal Trade Commission has charged the suppliers of supposed Hoodia
gordonii, also known as hoodia, with deceptive advertising for claiming that
using their product would lead to weight loss and appetite suppression. In its
complaint, the FTC alleges that the defendants not only made false and deceptive
claims about what hoodia could do, but also, on one or more occasions, claimed
that their product was Hoodia gordonii, a plant native to southern Africa, when
it was not. The FTC has requested that the court order the defendants not to
make false or deceptive statements or destroy documents pending trial. The
Commission seeks to permanently bar the defendants from deceptively advertising
hoodia, and to obtain disgorgement of the defendants’ profits from their hoodia
sales.
The defendants allegedly made false and deceptive claims when advertising
their fake hoodia to trade customers who manufactured and marketed supplements.
The complaint further charges that the defendants provided trade customers with
deceptive advertising and promotional materials – along with other materials
that purported to substantiate their claims. These customers then had the means
to deceive consumers who bought weight-loss products purportedly containing
hoodia. The complaint charges that the defendants made these false and deceptive
claims about their product: that it would enable consumers to lose weight and
suppress appetites; that it was scientifically proven to suppress appetite,
resulting in weight loss; that it was clinically proven to reduce caloric intake
by 1,000 to 2,000 calories per day; that it was derived from South African
Hoodia gordonii; and that hoodia was an effective treatment for
obesity.
The complaint names Delaware-based Nutraceuticals International, LLC, New
Jersey-based Stella Labs, LLC, and four individuals as liable for these charges.
The individual defendants are David J. Romeo, whom the complaint identifies as
controlling both companies; and Deborah B. Vickery, Craig Payton, and Zoltan
Klivinyi, who are officers or directors of one or both companies.
The Commission vote authorizing the staff to file the complaint was 4-0. On
March 20, 2009, the FTC filed its complaint in the U.S. District Court for the
District of New Jersey. The court has set a preliminary injunction hearing for
April 29, 2009.
NOTE: The Commission authorizes the filing of a complaint
when it has “reason to believe” that the law has or is being violated, and it
appears to the Commission that a proceeding is in the public interest. A
complaint is not a finding or ruling that the defendants have actually violated
the law.
The text in this article was prepared by the U.S. Federal Trade Commission.